Your Ad Here

View Poll Results: Who would do it?

Voters
8. You may not vote on this poll
  • I would. A baby will forget all about it and if I donīt tell him, heīd never know.

    0 0%
  • No I would not. Heīs got no way of answering back, so itīd be cruel of me to do it.

    1 12.50%
  • Why would I be so angry so as to want to hit a baby in the first place?

    7 87.50%
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 23

Thread: Who here would actually punch a baby?

  1. #1
    Believer in destruction Raze's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    On-line
    Posts
    556

    Who here would actually punch a baby?

    This witty statement from the anger meter begs the question. On the one hand, since a baby canīt remember what happens to him, he wonīt hold a grudge against the one that hits him. On the other itīs a very easy thing to do and he canīt respond. Why would somebody get angry enough to hit a baby in the first place? Iīm on the fence with this issue. I was wondering if you all might share your opinions on this.
    Last edited by Raze; 08-05-2010 at 06:45 PM.
    Destruction is a part of the natural life cycle. It paves the way for construction of something better.

  2. #2
    Happy birthday, bitches! Strife's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    1,737
    No one would. That's pretty much the dumbest question I've ever read.

  3. #3
    Junior Member Jellly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    12
    dude...hitting a baby? Are you fucking serious? Even a moderately strong punch could probably cause it serious pain and injury. :/

  4. #4
    Junior Member 4.cerealz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    rat-infested shit-hole, PA
    Posts
    28
    Quote Originally Posted by Raze View Post
    Why would somebody get angry enough to hit a baby in the first place?
    if you'd spent some time around a psychotic, paranoid, borderline schizophrenic OCPD father, you still WOULDN'T understand why someone would get angry enough to hit a baby, but at least witnessing it you wouldn't be able to deny that it DOES happen (AND that these kinds of people are the people who need to be sodomised in prison, NOT 17 year old kids who hit up a liquor store for a pack of marb reds).

    basically, you'd have to be insane to hit a baby. and this could actually be a good insanity test for new parents - except of course by that time they've already successfully reproduced, and we've failed to nip that problem in the bud.

    that whole line that babies don't remember the shit that has happened to them as small children/infants is complete and utter bullshit. in fact, whoever told that to you and WASN'T trying to hold back his laughter as he uttered the words is a complete moron. if you wanted to go back and punch THAT person, that would be acceptable. hasn't anyone ever heard of trauma?

    i guess by that logic it should be ok to stick your penis into an 8 month old baby. WHAT?? THEY WON'T REMEMBER IT!!!
    Last edited by 4.cerealz; 08-05-2010 at 10:15 PM.

  5. #5
    Rage-aholic Anonymous's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    71

    Smile

    I'd only punch a baby if I was really REALLY pissed off and the baby was annoying me super bad. Also, I'd be sure that I didn't kill or permanently harm the baby.

  6. #6
    Believer in destruction Raze's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    On-line
    Posts
    556
    Quote Originally Posted by Anonymous View Post
    I'd only punch a baby if I was really REALLY pissed off and the baby was annoying me super bad. Also, I'd be sure that I didn't kill or permanently harm the baby.
    Trouble is though when you discipline a child he learns from the experience. A baby wouldnīt learn a thing. If you ever punched a baby, left it for a time and then came back he or sheīd forget all about it.
    Destruction is a part of the natural life cycle. It paves the way for construction of something better.

  7. #7
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    10
    Only pussies beat on people/animals that are defenseless.

  8. #8
    If I could, I would.
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    4
    Ya, I saw that on the anger meter and since 101% angry wasnt on it, I chose 100% angry and the description was hit a baby....WTF. How about a description that doesnt involve hurting defencless, innocent things......

  9. #9
    Believer in destruction Raze's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    On-line
    Posts
    556
    Thinking about it, yeah. It donīt make sense to do something so easy and useless. How about something like " Government property is being razed!"
    Destruction is a part of the natural life cycle. It paves the way for construction of something better.

  10. #10
    FIGJAM Andeck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Norwegiana
    Posts
    787
    Jesus fucking Christ, why are people taking the anger meter seriously? How can anyone take anything on this forum seriously?
    Some call it a bicycle lane, I call it a kill zone

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •