Your Ad Here
Page 6 of 10 FirstFirst ... 45678 ... LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 96

Thread: Julia Gillard - beast of insincerity

  1. #51
    top down view

    True Blue's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    203
    hahaha....thats a curly one


    What do these hand gestures have in common?

    !







  2. #52
    Realist

    Agent Provocateur's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Van Diemen's Land
    Posts
    1,251
    Quote Originally Posted by True Blue View Post
    hahaha....thats a curly one


    What do these hand gestures have in common?
    So you think that Gillard is a Nazi??...
    Strife is officially my favorite toy (read: 'Online Bitch') to play with

  3. #53
    top down view

    True Blue's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    203
    Quote Originally Posted by Agent Provocateur View Post
    So you think that Gillard is a Nazi??...
    Use that big scroggin and think a little more outside the square. Gillard, Palin and Hitler what do they have in common apart from the same hand signals. Did they all read AP's book on 'signalling'...I'm guessing not, because Palin can't read, let alone talk and Hitler burned all books!

    Others will see different things. AP sees them as Nazis. Raze might see them as salvation masters for the armaggedon annihilation.

    The common themes I see in these three photos are: hate, ignorance and ultimate defeat
    Last edited by True Blue; 07-30-2010 at 08:12 AM.

  4. #54
    Realist

    Agent Provocateur's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Van Diemen's Land
    Posts
    1,251
    Quote Originally Posted by True Blue View Post
    Others will see different things. AP sees them as Nazis. Raze might see them as salvation masters for the armaggedon annihilation.
    You'll have to wait till you pass the 3rd grade and start 4th grade b4 you'll be taught what a question mark is
    Strife is officially my favorite toy (read: 'Online Bitch') to play with

  5. #55
    top down view

    True Blue's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    203
    Quote Originally Posted by Agent Provocateur View Post
    You'll have to wait till you pass the 3rd grade and start 4th grade b4 you'll be taught what a question mark is
    can't wait..............now have you finished with 'Where's Spot?'

  6. #56
    top down view

    True Blue's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    203
    Gillard's 'manbag' was caught speeding not once but twice in her prime ministerial car. Once is sort of forgiveable, but twice is attitudinal. That Labor mentality of we own the place. How much tax payer money has been spent on Road safety? In Victoria the Police minister, Tim Holding in his first week was caught speeding and fined. He has since been removed from the position. In the following comments from the puppet I read characteristic insincerity.

    "Yes Tim has had speeding fines - obviously he's paid the fines, paid the price," Ms Gillard said.

    "Silly thing to do - he acknowledges that."

  7. #57
    Happy birthday, bitches! Strife's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    1,737
    ZOMFG!!! her partner was caught speeding? WHAT THE HELL!!! That's outrageous!!! Well she's definitely lost my vote. Thanks for bringing their shocking above-the-law mentality to my attention, good sir.

  8. #58
    Realist

    Agent Provocateur's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Van Diemen's Land
    Posts
    1,251
    LOL...Is there anyone who lives in Victoria and drives that hasn't been done at least once by those fucking money making machines....Errrrr....cough...I mean road safety cameras??....
    Strife is officially my favorite toy (read: 'Online Bitch') to play with

  9. #59
    top down view

    True Blue's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    203
    Quote Originally Posted by Strife View Post
    ZOMFG!!! her partner was caught speeding? WHAT THE HELL!!! That's outrageous!!! Well she's definitely lost my vote. Thanks for bringing their shocking above-the-law mentality to my attention, good sir.
    Glad to see you've come to your senses.....

  10. #60
    top down view

    True Blue's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    203
    Why Labor will lose the election
    The 'policies on the run' campaign that swept them to office in 2007, was more an electoral backlash against the ultra-conservative Howard government. Howard's own party was telling him to step aside at the time. Of course the electorate was going to oust him. No one likes an old buggar who keeps hanging around, not listening, and delusional in his opinion of himself. (isn't that right Strife). So emphatic was the message to the old buggar, he lost his own safe seat. The problem for Labor was that they lost sight of the real reason they won the election and who could blame them? With such an emphatic victory maybe the electorate did see them as infallible.

    Three massive egos, with an emphatic win under their belt, something was going to give. But where Gillard is losing ground rapidly , and is fundamantally floored, and will be the death knell for the 'ego three', and pave the way for a new Labor breed led by Shorten and Combet, is her mindset on IR. She cut her teeth in opposition rallying against the ultra conservatives productivity reforms at the height of a twenty year economic rally. Those days are long past, and yet her mindset and raison d'etre( French for raison shaped date) is stuck, like a broken record, and fixated on the fear of Workchoices returning.

    What she and the last remaining ego Swannie can't see is that Workchoices is superfluous today, as the economic climate has changed to rising unemployment, rising interest rates, rising inflation. Small business doesn't need workchoices to lay off. They are laying people off, because of low growth, rising interest rates and creeping inflation as well as slowing demand.

    Good governemnt is about finding the balance between business efficiency and organised labour. Not aligning yourself with either is the key. Howard made the mistake of aligning himself to closely to business, and Gillard is making the same mistake with aligning herself to closely with the unions. During the campaign she flew to Melbourne to farewell her retiring bosom buddy, Sharon Burrows from presidency of the ACTU, and together they annointed her successor, another bosom buddy heading up the nurse's union, and to top it off Gillard threw in a promise of an extra 3000 nurses. Stronger unions = stronger Labor policy 101.

    The real joke is on the middle class, labor supporters who have always hated the conservatives, and who believe that labor champion the disadvantaged. What we are seeing is the slow(very slow in AP's case, and glacially slow in Strife's) awakening to the reality that this govt. is void of any policy other than it is against workchoices. Gillards own claim to fame is that she is the 'slayer of workchoices' "her proudest achievement".

    A litigating attorney by trade, that is what she knows. She is the master of spin, and answer avoidance, yes she is a lawyer, and that's what litigation lawyers do for a living.

    It will be her undoing. And as more people like Strife wake up to the reality, and stop voting 'for the poor people' which is how they see it, and start voting for themselves, then we will get a representative govt.
    Last edited by True Blue; 08-01-2010 at 10:38 AM.

Page 6 of 10 FirstFirst ... 45678 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •